Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) reported $55.87 million in revenue for the quarter ended June 2026, representing no change year over year. EPS of $0.15 for the same period compares to $0 a year ago.
The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $52.04 million, representing a surprise of +7.37%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of +7.14%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $0.14.
While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health.
Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance.
Here is how Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:- Policies in force (period-end): 316 thousand compared to the 306.46 thousand average estimate based on four analysts.
- Premium in force (period-end): 419 million versus the four-analyst average estimate of 407.02 million.
- Average number of employees: 60.8 thousand compared to the 64 thousand average estimate based on three analysts.
- Revenue per employee: $2.99 billion versus the three-analyst average estimate of $2.79 billion.
- Revenue- Fee income: $13.34 million compared to the $12.42 million average estimate based on four analysts.
- Revenue- Commission income: $42.53 million compared to the $39.61 million average estimate based on four analysts.
View all Key Company Metrics for Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. here>>>
Shares of Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. have returned +10% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's -0.6% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).