SerpApi.Org
Jim Bowden wants the Padres to pull the plug. But the problem is they still have a pulse. During a recent appearance on “Front Office Unfiltered,” the longtime baseball executive argued that the Friars should aggressively shop Mason Miller and Michael King before the trade deadline. The logic makes sense. They’re hovering around .500, buried 13 games behind the Dodgers and stuck in third place in the NL West. This isn’t exactly what a contender looks like.
Bowden wants a reboot. Plenty of Padres fans probably want the same. But the division deficit hides a number that still matters: San Diego is only two games out of a Wild Card spot.
That doesn’t make the Padres good. But it does mean they’re still alive. That’s the difference, and the reason why his prescription may feel too aggressive. Trading King is one thing. Shopping Miller like a team conducting an estate sale is something else entirely.
The Padres didn’t surrender Leo De Vries and three pitching prospects for Miller and JP Sears just to flip Miller one year later because the lineup forgot how to hit. De Vries has continued to develop into one of baseball’s top prospects. Reopening that wound would require a massive return.
Miller is under club control through the 2029 season. He’s one of the most dominant relievers in baseball. He is also the Padres’ lone All-Star, which says as much about the rest of the roster as it does about him.
October remains close enough to cloud the Padres’ judgment
The Padres have earned every uncomfortable trade rumor that has come their way. There’s no excuse for a team with Fernando Tatis Jr., Manny Machado, Jackson Merrill, Xander Bogaerts, King and Miller to be scraping along below .500 in late July. They were constructed to challenge LA, not stare at the Wild Card standings and count how many teams they have to climb over.
Honestly, Bowden is right about the larger problem. The Padres are trapped in baseball’s most irritating neighborhood. They aren’t good enough to trust, or bad enough to dismiss. They have an expensive veteran core, a depleted farm system and a general manager who has spent years pushing tomorrow’s chips into the middle.
That’s how organizations get stuck. The Padres may already be there; they just refuse to admit it. There’s little reason to add another mediocre starter, sacrifice another prospect and hope the stars suddenly begin playing like stars. It’s a movie as old as time. The ending usually involves an October golf reservation. Why should they bother?
The Padres aren’t in a conventional championship window, but they aren’t entering a conventional rebuild either. Their big contracts aren’t disappearing because Bowden used the word “reboot.”
That’s the real problem with a Miller sell-off. It wouldn’t create a fresh start. It would place a rebuilding move on top of a roster that can’t fully rebuild.
Today's best reads
- Padres roped into awkward Mason Miller-Yankees trade rumors during All-Star festivities
- Padres fans should brace for an A.J. Preller trade deadline first since 2019
- Padres would compound the Xander Bogaerts mistake by sacrificing Mason Miller
- Padres desperately need Manny Machado's pre-All-Star break heater to continue
- Michael King is the only thing keeping Padres’ rotation from total collapse
This article was originally published on friarsonbase.com as Jim Bowden’s radical Padres trade proposal ignores one inconvenient truth.
