Search Everything in One Place

Explore the web, images, videos, news, and more – all in one place.

Finance

Here’s how WA graduation standards may change

Here’s how WA graduation standards may change
Laura Chang leads a lesson with students in her math classroom at McClure Middle School in Seattle. (Ellen M. Banner / The Seattle Times, 2024)

The latest draft prioritizes math courses and scraps the requirement that students demonstrate their readiness through one of the “graduation pathways.”

Washington's proposed overhaul of high school graduation requirements is coming into focus as state education leaders refine a proposal they say provides more academic rigor and time to map postsecondary plans. 

The latest draft prioritizes math courses and scraps the requirement that students demonstrate their readiness through one of the “graduation pathways,” which can include a passing score on a state standardized test or completing a series of career and technical education courses. And while students will still need to complete 24 credits to graduate, there would be greater emphasis on choosing electives that align with a student’s goals after high school. 

The proposal has been in the works since 2025, when the state Board of Education assembled a task force composed of leaders from across the government, community organizations and businesses. The group was charged with rethinking whether Washington’s requirements still reflect the knowledge and skills students need as increasing numbers of jobs require education or training beyond high school.

Their assessment, after more than a year of work, was that those requirements needed a refresh. 

Washington’s current graduation standards, in place since 2020, have been criticized for being convoluted and duplicative. On top of credit requirements, students must complete a graduation pathway and fill out a postsecondary planning document called the High School and Beyond Plan, which many students and counselors have described as a box-checking exercise. 

The state board said scrapping the graduation pathways could allow students to spend more time completing the High School and Beyond Plan with fidelity. The current proposal expands the number of courses students will choose based on the goals stated in their plans, also called Personalized Pathway courses.

The biggest change is to math requirements. The state currently requires three years of math, but the kind of math is not specified for that third year. Under the proposal, Algebra II would become the default third-year math course, though students could instead take statistics, data science or financial algebra if those options better support their postgraduate plans. Board officials say the change is intended both to better align with admissions expectations at Washington's public universities and ensure students pursuing other plans still complete rigorous quantitative coursework.

The task force is recommending a fourth year of math in the Personalized Pathway, as well as one credit of a financial education and life skills class. State Board of Education officials emphasized that while students could substitute those requirements, every school district would still be required to offer the math and financial education courses. 

One proposal discussed earlier in the process has been dropped. The task force decided not to recommend a statewide senior year demonstration of learning, such as a capstone project or exit interview, after members raised concerns that districts facing staffing and budget constraints might not be able to implement the requirement in a meaningful way.

Some questions remain unresolved. Board officials said they have not yet reached consensus on whether local school districts would continue to be allowed to impose graduation requirements beyond the state's minimum standards, such as requiring additional credits. 

The graduation framework is emerging alongside several other statewide efforts that state lawmakers will review next year, all aimed at increasing further study after high school.

Last week, Gov. Bob Ferguson proposed that completion of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid be made a high school graduation requirement, arguing that more students would pursue college or job training if they understood the financial aid available to them.

Meanwhile, Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal has proposed a senior year course combining civics, financial education and life skills. 

The state board recommends keeping civics as its own stand-alone graduation requirement while creating a separate full-credit Personalized Pathway course that includes financial education, life skills and dedicated time for students to work on their High School and Beyond Plans. Board officials say their research suggests financial education alone requires close to half a credit of instruction, making it difficult to combine with civics in a single course.

The state board proposal also allows for more flexibility over when students take that course, rather than requiring it in senior year.

Several steps still remain before any of these proposals become law. 

In August, the state board is expected to vote on a resolution confirming the overall framework. A month later, members are scheduled to consider draft legislation and administrative rules needed to implement the proposal.

Some portions of the framework, such as changes to graduation pathways and any requirements carrying fiscal impacts, would require legislative approval. Other changes could be made through the board's administrative rulemaking authority, though those rules cannot be finalized until after the legislative session concludes.

Board officials say the earliest any new graduation requirements could take effect would be for the class of 2031, though that timeline could shift depending on legislative action and funding decisions.

Members of the public can continue submitting comments directly to the state Board of Education and provide testimony during the board's August and September meetings. If lawmakers take up the proposal next year, there will also be opportunities for public testimony throughout the legislative process, while the board's administrative rulemaking process will include its own formal public comment period before any rules are finalized.

Read full story on The Seattle Times

Related News

More stories you might be interested in.

Top