American Airlines' new refund rule for involuntary downgrades is leaving behind many frustrated passengers in recent months. Many feel that the compensation offered doesn't come close to the value of their original tickets, especially when American Airlines passengers are losing first-class seats due to ongoing cabin issues.
That has put the carrier in the spotlight several times recently, including when an American was called out by a Star Wars actor who was stripped of his first-class seat.
However, the carrier's policy for refundable tickets and flight cancellations is seemingly more straightforward. But one passenger's recent experience with the airline has sparked a discussion about who is responsible for a flight canceled due to geopolitical conflict and miscommunication between several customer service agents.
In a Reddit thread, a couple says they were left holding the bag by the air carrier after their fully refundable Tel Aviv-to-San Diego tickets were disrupted during the Israeli conflict. According to the passenger’s account, American canceled their original flight and rebooked them at no extra cost to leave from another city instead.
The couple says they even received confirmation emails for this new itinerary, only to be told later that the reservation didn't exist. After purchasing new tickets with another airline out of necessity, the couple expected some measure of refund from the original American Airlines itinerary — but they were ultimately disappointed with American's response and limited compensation for a flight they never took.
The account raises an interesting question: what happens when an airline agent appears to rebook a passenger during a crisis, sends confirmation, and then the airline later says the booking never existed?
The Passenger Says A Cairo Rebooking Vanished
The original itinerary, according to the Reddit post, was from Tel Aviv to San Diego on American Airlines. The couple said they paid $1,232.80 per person for fully refundable round-trip tickets, or $2,465.60 total.
Their return flight to Tel Aviv was canceled due to the conflict in Israel, according to the post. That alone would have put the passengers into a complicated travel situation. During conflict, airlines can suspend routes, cancel flights, issue waivers, and leave travelers trying to reach safer, alternative departure cities.
The poster says an American Airlines employee offered a solution: a free rebooking to fly back from Cairo instead of Tel Aviv. This suggestion came after the couple advised the agent they were evacuating to Egypt at the advice of the United States Embassy.
The passenger said American sent confirmation emails for the Cairo itinerary. But when they called back later to check if there was an earlier flight, they said the Cairo booking was gone from the system. According to the post, American instead showed them a replacement flight departing from Tel Aviv, their original departure point.
At that point, the couple bought tickets on another airline out of Cairo.
That detail turns the story from a standard cancellation complaint into something outside the typical scenario. Cairo is in an entirely different country, far from the original departure city. While the U.S. Embassy advised Americans to evacuate the country, which the couple chose to do, that doesn't necessarily leave the airline responsible for itinerary changes — especially if flights from Tel Aviv were still available.
However, it's also unreasonable to expect the couple to return to Tel Aviv after evacuating just to catch a flight — especially when an airline representative emailed them a confirmation for a new trip departing from Egypt.
People are most angry about the refund calculation
The original poster made it clear they weren't expecting American Airlines to be held responsible for the conflict in Israel.
"I’m not asking whether airlines should be responsible for a war," they wrote. "I’m trying to understand whether their handling of my reservation seems reasonable."
American Airlines later refunded only $252.15 per ticket, according to the passenger, and the carrier also refused to pay for the last-minute replacement flights they bought. For two people, that came to $504.30 for the unused leg, and it's unclear how much additional the flights from Cairo put them out of pocket.
The couple says they originally paid $1,232.80 per person for a round-trip. If half the journey was unused, that would suggest $616.40 for half the fare. That means the difference between what they originally paid and what American refunded them is roughly $728 total.
Granted, airlines don't generally calculate refunds evenly this way, as different legs of travel have different values depending on departure and destination cities and other factors.
"That refund sounds correct - international roundtrips aren’t equally split between the segments, and when one leg gets cancelled they might reprice as a one-way which is often much more expensive," one commenter noted. "This is standard practice across the industry."
However, when considering the entire situation at face value, many may still wonder, if the tickets were fully refundable, why the couple allegedly received such a small fraction of the ticket price and were denied reimbursement on their replacement flight? Especially after they were already inconvenienced through a miscommunication on the airline's behalf.
What American’s Own Rules Say About Refunds
American’s Conditions of Carriage say that when American or an airline partner cancels a flight, or when an international itinerary is delayed by four or more hours, its sole obligation is to refund the unused ticket value and optional fees according to its involuntary refunds policy, subject to its delayed or canceled flight rebooking policy.
American also says it will promptly and automatically refund the ticketed fare, including taxes and fees, when there is a cancellation or significant itinerary change and the customer chooses not to fly on the changed flight, accept rebooking, or accept other compensation.
For refundable tickets, American’s published rule is even simpler. If a passenger bought a refundable ticket, decides not to travel, and travel has not started, American says it will refund the full amount of the ticket. If travel has already partially begun, American says it will refund the value of the unused travel.
In this couple's case, that would include the return trip from Tel-Aviv to San Diego.
American’s contract also has a force majeure section for events beyond the airline’s control. It lists war, embargoes, unsettled international conditions, terrorism, government requirements, weather, and other events. In those cases, American says it will refund the unused portion if the ticket still has value, but beyond that it is not liable.
The company's policy helps explain why American might refuse to pay for the Cairo flights on another airline after a war-related cancellation, especially if the passengers didn't have prior authorization to self-book a replacement journey. However, it doesn't fully explain how the unused portion of the $1,232.80 Tel Aviv ticket was determined to be worth only $252.15.
DOT Rules May Be Relevant, But The Answer Isn't Straightforward
U.S. Department of Transportation refund rules give passengers strong rights when an airline cancels or significantly changes a flight, and the passenger does not accept the alternative offered.
DOT says passengers are entitled to an automatic refund when an airline cancels or significantly changes a flight to, from, or within the U.S., and the passenger does not accept a changed flight, rebooked flight, travel credit, voucher, or other compensation.
DOT also says refunds must include the ticket price and all government-imposed taxes and fees and airline-imposed fees, and must be made to the original form of payment when owed.
That part appears helpful to the couple, at least on the refund question. A Tel Aviv-to-San Diego trip involves U.S. air travel, and the passenger says American canceled the original flight.
But what complicates things is the alleged Cairo rebooking, and ultimately, the replacement flight that was confirmed to depart from Tel Aviv.
If American argues the couple accepted an alternate arrangement, that may complicate the refund. If the couple says the Cairo arrangement disappeared and was never actually available, they may argue they never received the alternative transportation American appeared to promise. If American says the Cairo trip was never ticketed, then the confirmation emails sent to the couple become key evidence.
However, the fact that the couple appeared to have a replacement flight departing from Tel Aviv complicates the situation, as American could argue it offered a replacement flight that was accepted and never taken at the couple's own choosing.
This is also why several Reddit commenters suggested filing a DOT complaint. DOT will not act as a private lawyer for every individual dispute, but it does collect air travel service complaints and uses complaint records to identify patterns and possible violations.
For passengers, a DOT complaint is often a smart next step when an airline refund dispute hinges on canceled flights, refund rules, and written records.
Reddit Commenters Were Divided Over Who Was Responsible
Some commenters sided with the couple, especially because the passenger says they had confirmation emails for the Cairo itinerary.
"Nah that's not even close to reasonable," one wrote. "They sent you a confirmed itinerary for Cairo then just... pretended it never happened? That's not a glitch that's a bait and switch. The fact they only refunded $250 of a $1200 fully refundable ticket is wild, even without the Cairo mess. I'd be filing a DOT complaint and maybe looking into small claims if you've got that confirmation email saved."
Others weren't so sure. Some questioned whether the Cairo itinerary had actually been ticketed or only reserved.
"Through my own personal experience, I've found that when one airline passes a reservation on to another airline, even within the same alliance, processes don't work properly and tickets often disappear into the mist," another commenter wrote. "I have a feeling that the first AA rep didn't actually ticket the reservation properly, so the other airline deleted it."
Meanwhile, some wondered whether the passengers had misunderstood what American had offered. Others pointed out that if travelers self-book with another airline without written authorization, obtaining reimbursement can be difficult, even when the original disruption was real.
But, even with the replacement leg out of the picture, the question of how the refunded fare was calculated is a major point. How could a round-trip ticket worth more than $1,200 be reduced to roughly $250 for half of the journey?
Another commenter wrote: "Honestly, you seem to be into lawyer territory with this one. If the underfunded fare is worth going through the hassle of the attorney, I’d seek legal help."
What Travelers Should Do If An Airline Rebooks Them
Instead of taking an agent's word for it over the phone, travelers can take a few extra steps to make sure their replacement travel is properly validated.
Travelers should always ask for the new ticket number and make sure each passenger has one. They should check the reservation in both the airline’s app and the operating carrier’s website if a partner airline is involved. If the trip involves a new city, country, or airport, they should ask the airline to confirm in writing that the change was authorized at no additional cost.
Passengers should also avoid canceling anything themselves until they understand how that affects refund rights. Canceling a reservation in the app can sometimes change the airline’s view of the case from involuntary disruption to voluntary cancellation.
Also, there are a few additional things to keep in mind before self-booking a new flight if travelers expect to receive either a refund or reimbursement.:
Despite escalating their concerns multiple times, the couple allegedly received written notice. Despite escalating their concerns multiple times, they allegedly received written notice from the airline that "American Airlines had completed its review and had 'determined that no further action will be taken regarding this matter.'"
At this stage, filing a DOT complaint or pursuing legal action may be the couple's only remaining options.
For other travelers, the example serves as a lesson not to rely on a confirmation email or even a boarding pass as the only evidence of a flight reservation.
Instead, make sure the flight exists, the tickets are in the right travelers' names, and the airline has put any refund or compensation promises in writing.