Search Everything in One Place

Explore the web, images, videos, news, and more – all in one place.

News

Your dominant hand isn't a hard-wired preference, a new study suggests. Here's why it's better

Your Dominant Hand Isn't a Hard-Wired Preference, a New Study Suggests. Here's Why It's Better.
(Jacob Wackerhausen/Creatas Video+/Getty Images Plus)

(Jacob Wackerhausen/Creatas Video+/Getty Images Plus) Are you right-handed? Left-handed? Or even ambidextrous? For most of your life, you've probably heard that this has something to do with the way your brain is hardwired: that preference seems to show up even before you are born, after all. But a new study by neurologists at the University of California, Los Angeles and Johns Hopkins University suggests that arm dominance is much more to do wit

Are you right-handed? Left-handed? Or even ambidextrous?

For most of your life, you've probably heard that this has something to do with the way your brain is hardwired: that preference seems to show up even before you are born, after all.

But a new study by neurologists at the University of California, Los Angeles and Johns Hopkins University suggests that arm dominance is much more to do with practice than something innate within the brain.

"Limb dominance is often taken as evidence that the dominant hemisphere is intrinsically better at motor control," write Ahmet Arac, Nicolas Jeong Lee, and John Krakauer, in a paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"We tested an alternative: dominance reflects asymmetric practice with tools and objects requiring precise control of complex trajectory shapes."

Since most people have already been using their dominant hand loyally throughout their lives, it's difficult to design an experiment to test this hypothesis.

Arac and colleagues came up with a clever way to control for existing dominance, though: making people write with their elbows, something most people have probably never attempted, let alone practiced, before.

Their thinking was that if the brain had some innate preference for limb dominance, then a right-handed person should be much better at writing with their right elbow than their left.

They got healthy, right-handed participants to write the letter 'A' and the number '8' with their dominant and non-dominant hand, eight times.

Then, they did the same task again, but instead of using their hands to write, participants used their elbows, with a pen strapped pointy-end down to allow for mark-making.

A New Study Suggests Your Dominant Hand Isn't Hardwired - It's Just Had More Practice
For elbow writing, the pen was securely attached to the elbow to prevent wobbling. (Arac et al., PNAS , 2026)

Even though all the participants were right-handed, they failed just as miserably at writing with their right elbow as they did with their left, according to analysis conducted with the help of a neural network that was trained to cluster shapes as 'good' or 'bad'.

Even when time spent writing each character was factored in, there was no sign that the right elbow had an advantage.

"There were no significant differences or trends between the dominant and non-dominant elbow characters," the researchers report.

"Dominance disappeared."

Next, they tested whether elbow-writing practice could make a difference. Half of the participants were trained to write with the elbow of their dominant limb; the other half, their non-dominant elbow.

Subscribe to ScienceAlert's free fact-checked newsletter
Subscribe to ScienceAlert's free fact-checked newsletter

All elbows "began at similarly poor shape quality prior to training", the authors write, but afterwards, "elbow-writing quality improved substantially for both sides."

Firstly, this proved that elbows aren't the problem: we can learn to use them to write, and our abilities will improve with practice.

Secondly, it adds further evidence to the theory that the writing abilities of our dominant hand comes from years of practice, rather than some built-in brain feature that selects the side best-suited to fine motor skills.

Preferences are also shown with tools like tennis rackets or pens because they are essentially extensions of the hand.

Related: Two Ancient Clues May Finally Explain Why 90% of Us Are Right-Handed

"The dominant arm isn't more capable because one hemisphere of the brain is simply better at controlling movement," Arac says.

"It is because we've spent a lifetime practicing the specific, complicated movements that tools and handwriting demand. Take away that practice by switching to a body part like the elbow that's never done the task before and the advantage disappears."

The research was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

This article was fact-checked by Carly Cassella and edited by Michael Irving. While we pride ourselves on our process, we are only human. If you spot a mistake, please let us know.

ScienceAlert stories are written, fact-checked, and edited by humans, never generated by AI. Don't miss a story, subscribe here.

Read full story on ScienceAlert

Related News

More stories you might be interested in.

'A significant public health issue': Breathing polluted air could raise Parkinson's risk by 10 percent
ScienceAlert·1 hour ago

'A significant public health issue': Breathing polluted air could raise Parkinson's risk by 10 percent

(Suriyawut Suriya/Canva) We know that air pollution is bad for us, and if we think about it, it's probably obvious that it's particularly bad for our lungs. But many people don't realize how much it affects many other bodily systems. Pollutants in the air don't just get into our lung tissue and stay there. The tiniest pollutants from car and truck tailpipe emissions, industrial sources, and wildfires can penetrate through the lungs and start cir

Ultimate limit of the human lifespan may be identified, study suggests
ScienceAlert·3 hours ago

Ultimate limit of the human lifespan may be identified, study suggests

Long-lived neurons in the brain are among the cells most vulnerable to the gradual accumulation of somatic DNA mutations, according to the new model. (Ruslanas Baranauskas/Science Photo Library/Getty Images) When the iconic rock band Queen asked, "Who wants to live forever?" the question was rhetorical, but for many people, the answer was "Yes". Well, a new study suggests immortal life may be scientifically impossible, even if we somehow found th

A rare, distant space rock killed the dinosaurs – and it reveals just how unlucky they were
ScienceAlert·8 hours ago

A rare, distant space rock killed the dinosaurs – and it reveals just how unlucky they were

(Mark Garlick/Science Photo Library/Getty Images) The dinosaurs had a good run, but when their time was up, it was very much up. Around 66 million years ago, a massive asteroid slammed into what is now the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. The impact triggered worldwide wildfires, towering tsunamis, ocean acidification, volcanic eruptions, and earthquakes. Debris clouded the sky, reducing sunlight and cooling the planet, which killed plant life and

Moss is generating electrical waves that look startlingly like a neural network
ScienceAlert·14 hours ago

Moss is generating electrical waves that look startlingly like a neural network

A different type of moss to the one studied. (Oliver Strewe/Getty Images Plus) Mosses are some of the earliest plants that appeared in the fossil record, but they're anything but simple. A new study, published in Royal Society Open Science, reveals that moss cushions produce surprisingly complex electrical activity, with patterns that undulate across the velvety patch in dynamic waves. The study's sole author, Andy Adamatzky, is actually a comput

Top